Page 1





Assessment & ESL
Curriculum
LT & CTE
Professional Development
Special Education
Student Interventions
Approach
Person(s) Responsible
Timeline
Resources
Formative Evaluation
Summative Evaluation
C. Provide focus for instruction through the development of Power Standards

Analyze the implementation of power standards through checkpoint results
Evaluate student perforamnce results in math and science as measured by the TAKS.
Deployment


1. Implement Power Standards for K-12 Math
Director of Curriculum, Math Coordinator
Fall 2009
Time and Effort

2. Support Standards Based Grading Pilot for World Geography, Algebra 1, World History, US History, Algebra 2, Math Models, Pre-Calculus and Calculus through the development of power standards.
Director of Curriculum, Math Coordinator, Subject Leaders
Fall 2009
Time and Effort
Leighanne will contact Kim Estes about the status of this.
3. Provide support to science teachers in each course area to identify power standards for the new TEKS.
Science Coordinator
Ongoing: To be completed May 2010
$6950.
Check cost: May be more because additonal days were added
4. Provide training for teachers on use and purpose of the power standards.
Math Coordinator, Science Coordinator, Instructional Coaches, Director of Curriculum
October 2009
Time and Effort Training PP
Training PP given to Principals, Instructional Coaches and All Staff
5. Implement the Power Standards for K, 1, 2, 4, 5, for the old science TEKS
Science Coordinator, Principals, Science Teachers
Beginning August, 2010
Time and Effort
6. PDSA after receiving results on student performance
Director of Curriculum, Math and Science Coordinator
May 2010
Time and Effort
Approach
Person(s) Responsible
Timeline
Resources
Formative Evaluation
Summative Evaluation
D. Develop and implement student friendly learning targets to provide measurable and understandable goals for learning.

Checkpoint results and classroom observation
Teacher feedback form measuring clarity and alignment. Student performance as measured by TAKS.
Deployment


1. Work with teachers to develop student friendly learning targets in math and science.each core area
Math and Science Coordinators
Elementary August 2009
Time and Effort
Check on secondary
2. Train teachers in learning targets in math and science
Math and Science Coordinators
Fall 2009 Curriculum Previews Dates
Time and Effort

3. Implement learning targets in math and science
Principals and math and science teachers
Fall 2009
Time and Effort

4. PDSA learning targets using low performing SEs and evaluating qulaity and clarity of learning targets
MC, SC, Dir of Curriculum
June 2010
Time and Effort


Approach
Person(s) Responsible
Timeline
Resources
Formative Evaluation
Summative Evaluation
E. Align and deploy the K-5 BISD Early Literacy program for developing strong readers.

Beginning of year data will serve as baseline to measure against middle of year reading levels.
End of year reading level data will be analyzed for improvement by campus and district.
Deployment


1. Implement a common reading level assessment in grades K-5 to track reading development.
Director of Curriculum, Campus Reading Intervention Teachers
BOY, MOY, EOY
Quantitative Reading Assessment: $6,000.
Complete
2. Provide training for teachers to use the new reading level assessment through campus reading intervention personnel.
Director of Curriculum, Campus Reading Intervention Teachers
September 2009
Time and Effort
Complete
3. Communicate the district's Early Literacy Focal Points to teachers.
Director of Curriculum, Campus Reading Intervention Teachers
August 2009
Time and Effort
Complete
4. Provide support for teachers on the Focal Points through campus instructional coaches.
Director of Curriculum, Campus Reading Intervention Teachers, Instructional Coaches
Ongoing 2009
Time and Effort

Approach
Person(s) Responsible
Timeline
Resources
Formative Evaluation
Summative Evaluation
F. Provide Curriculum Previews at the beginning of each six weeks for Math and Science in grades K-5

Analize the implementation of power standards through checkpoint results
Evaluate student performance on the Power Standards in math and science as measured by the TAKS.
Deployment


1. Electronic curriculum previews will be developed that include a the power standards, SE's, student friendly learning targets, common vocabulary, lesson sample for targeted SE's, and suggested pacing for the unit.
Director of Curriculum, Math and Science Coordinators
Each six week grading period
Time and Effort

2. Electronic curriculum previews will be implemented.
Director of Curriculum, Math and Science Coordinators, Director of Instructional Technology
Every six weeks
Illuminate license, training, technology resources, Pacing Guides

3. Provide open house demonstration of key activities and resources
Math and Science Coordinators
Every six weeks
Facility and Utility Costs

4. PDSA the training
Math and Science Coordinators
January 2010
Feedback form

Approach
Person(s) Responsible
Timeline
Resources
Formative Evaluation
Summative Evaluation
G. Increase BEST Kit utilization to improve student performance for all students

Monitor BEST Kit useage through Science Depot

Judy keeping record
Improved student performance as measured by the TAKS, Checkpoints, gap closure within 6%, and commended rates that meet or exceed 50%
Deployment


1. Include BEST Kits and highlight demonstrations through Curriculum Previews
Scence Coordinator
Every six weeks
BEST Kits

2. Align checkpoints to BEST Kit activities and resources
Science Coordinator and Director of Assessment
End-of-unit assessments
Time and Effort

3. Provide on-going classroom support to teachers
Science Coordinator
Ongoing
Time and Effort

4. Ensure that each elementary campus has a plan in place for the consistent use of the district curriculum in science (BEST Kits)
Elementary Principals
November 2009
Campus Improvement Plans